Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a tv |
On 3/23/2024 3:16 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:Noted lefty lib'rul Antonin Scalia on the 2nd Amendment and rights.On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:26:58 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:"SOME amendments are sacrosanct", a theologism, is what's absurd here.
>On Mar 22, 2024 at 4:08:21 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:In other words the "reductio ad absurdem" argument where one defeats
>
No, I don't. Every time you bring that up, I ask you whether you think that
it'd be okay for the government to make exceptions to Amendment XIX and
prohibit women from voting since "no amendment is sacrosanct", after all. Or
since "no amendment is sacrosanct", it'd be okay for the government to
prohibit black people from voting (Amendment XV) and allow people to be owned
as slaves (Amendment XIII).
>
And that's when *you* go into a coma.
>
an argument by showing where the logical extension from it leads to an
absurdity.
“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment right is not unlimited…. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”He said "Like most rights"... That was in the good old days when you couldn't buy a Justice. I don't see this illegitimate court having any bounds.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.