Re: Ketanji Jackson Worried That the 1st Amendment is Hamstringing Government Censorship

In article <utms44$3n6po$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 3/22/24 4:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Mar 22, 2024 at 4:22:34 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On 3/21/24 1:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

  In article <uthibv$29328$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
  wrote:

Or try publishing National Defense secrets...

>
No, Effa, we already resolved that one and, as usual, your point of
view loses:
>
New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
>
RULING: The New York Times' publishing of the national security
information found in the Pentagon Papers is protected speech under
the 1st Amendment, even during time of war.
>
Once again reinforcing that there is no 'emergency exception' to the
requirements and restrictions the Constitution places on the
government.
>
(This is one of those landmark cases that you should have learned
about in grade school, Effa. Certainly something a self-proclaimed
amateur historian should-- but apparently doesn't-- know.)
>

And the press is a protected institution. You're not the press.

 
Nowhere does the 1st Amendment limit press protection to only people
who work for big legacy corporations. Indeed, the Supreme Court has
ruled that citizen media-- bloggers, YouTubers, individual citizens
commenting on websites-- all fall under the 1st Amendment's press
protections.
 
You're 0 for 2 on this one, Shit-Shoes. Wanna go for the hat trick?

>
Read the Espionage act fuckwad?

 
Don't need to.

 
That's obvious. You just make it up... of course you don't need to read.

You're the one who's inexplicably denying the existence of Marbury vs
Madison these days.

You're the one who's saying shit with no case citations to back it up,
whereas I've provided three citations in this thread to back up my
claims.