Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a tv |
On Mar 27, 2024 at 8:05:40 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>On 3/27/2024 7:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:higher socialIn article
<17c0c13d249c8eca$72548$1768716$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <uu22s3$32lii$2@dont-email.me>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:Last Friday, a Chicago alderman (there are cockroaches with>standing) gave a speech at a rally outside city hall condemning Biden
and support for Israel in the war against Hamas. A veteran had burned a
special American flagWhy is it that burning the American flag is protected speech, but if you
burn an Alphabet Mafia rainbow flag, you can get arrested for a hate
crime?
You mean a flag that does not belong to you, not your own flag.
No, I mean any rainbow flag. If you go buy one yourself, then take it to
an anti-troon protest and burn it, it's a hate crime.
But if you buy an American flag and take it to an Antifa riot and burn
it, protected speech.The former action is one of hate, the latter is one of protest.
What if the former is one of protest, too?
That'd be for a judge to be convinced of
Since when do I have to convince the government of the reasons for my speech
to keep from being jailed for it?
>
"Congress shall make no law..."
>...who might ask, e.g., whether the defendant *knew* how the act would be>
perceived.
My right to free speech isn't dependent on how someone else-- with an agenda
of their own-- might perceive my words.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.