Re: Ketanji Jackson Worried That the 1st Amendment is Hamstringing Government Censorship

In article <Dh9ON.177704$zF_1.36010@fx18.iad>,
 trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

On 3/30/24 3:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu9d3v$1363u$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 3/29/24 1:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

Jesus, can you read?
>
New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
>

You're not the NY Times.

>
Don't have to be. Nowhere in the opinion did the Court limit its
decision to only huge legacy media corporations. And in subsequent
decisions has recognized the speech of ordinary citizens doing nothing
more than posting on the internet as protected by the Free Press Clause.
>
This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>

Nope. Just because you keep repeating it doesn't make it so.

 
No, it's so because the Supreme Court says it's so.

 
The right wing asshole Supreme Court you mean?

No, Hutt, you acne-encrusted incel. The liberal Supreme Court that decided the case in 1971. I even put
the date in the cite a half-dozen times in this thread and that lump of
human stool between your ears still couldn't figure it out.