Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a tv |
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 08:42:55 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:I believe that when you start with good intentions, and end up with authoritarian rule, it wasn't about the good intentions in the first place.
You seriously believe 5 and 6 year olds should be exposed to the sameMore to the point, it's restricted to 'primary age' kids which around>
here means grades 1-3. Which in my opinion is totally reasonable. If
it were grades 9-12 I likely would feel differently.
>
Sure. Until it isn't. You start there and they quickly worked their
way up.
>
That's how it's done. Once you see the nose of a camel in the tent,
it's quickly followed by the rest of the camel.
materials as 16 and 17 year olds? That's the clear implication of what
you said.
I remember in jr high we had our sex ed class where having seen "Boy
to Man" in grades 7 and 8, in grade 9 the teacher asked us if we'd
like to see "Girl to Woman" (which is what the girls' portion of the
class had been viewing). It was mostly ho-hum and I learned little.
(While I didn't have an older sister I had found my Mom's pads and so
forth and had been curious enough to check out at the library
precisely what they had been used for - and learned what it meant when
they weren't needed - e.g. either pregnancy or menopause - I didn't
yet know menstruation could be altered by the pill)
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.