Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a tv |
On 4/17/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <uvog6v$1jt55$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788. Met 1789.
wrote:
>On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:>On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:>On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>. . .>And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't denounced any
of them, since he's decreed that denouncing political violence
is the duty of every president.
[Fred Phelps citing headline]>>>>>Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent protests>Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming it does
and that Biden has condemned them?>Wow. Baby steps, I guess.>Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet today?>It exists as a concept, but not as an organization.LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the federal>
courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer of Love,
was it?
I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These large-scale
protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were organized
through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An "organization" is a
body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those
tweeting.
Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists recognize
Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'.
He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're not a
group.
fact that they worked in concert is what made them an organization,
even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or
unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other organic
documents. Working together by passing the word along is what made
them an organization.
>
It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the organizing.
This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a common
purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization.
Two dumbfucks don't make a right.
>
From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
defend.
Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
defend Congress, jackass.
>
Which mean there was no Congress until at least 1789, not 1787 as you
claimed above.
Any questions?
All I mentioned was a date. I made no claim.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.