Re: NY Judge: 2nd Amendment Doesn't Exist in My Courtroom

On Apr 30, 2024 at 6:16:06 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

On 4/29/24 10:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 In article <20240429200019.0000350d@example.com>,
   Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
 

 On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:58:53 +0000
 BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 

 First Hawaii, now this judge in New York. Maybe the law schools these
 people are graduating from should spend less time teaching "social
 activism" and more time teaching actual law.
 
 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JrizNJXQ0iw

 

 Is she finding wording in Amendment 14.5, like a clause
 that says parts of the Constitution and its Amendments can be ignored
 by any judge who finds them inconvenient?

 
 First Hawaii's legislature decides it can ignore the 2nd Amendment and
 now this judge in New York. Seems this is starting to be the go-to move
 with the gun-grabbers: Can't get the rulings we want from the federal
 courts and SCOTUS, so we'll just ignore the 2nd Amendment altogether and
 do whatever we want.
 
 And, of course, the people who support this judge would have screeching
 meltdowns if other judges started ignoring the parts of the Constitution
 they *like*. This is another of those 'rules' that only works one way: if
 it benefits the Agenda, it's cool; if it doesn't it's an affront to all
 that's good and decent.
 
 And these are the people who are constantly beating their chests in
 defense of "muh democracy!"
 
 IMHO, being a Constitution Denier ought to be grounds for immediate
 removal from the bench. (And it probably would be if we were talking
 about a... ahem... *different* judge.)
 

So he's a Republican?

WTF are you raving about now?

There's no 'he' in this entire scenario. (Unless the NY judge is a troon, I
guess. Never can count that out these days.)