Re: [OT] Now the wokesters are demanding we use different terms for well-known animals

On Mon, 06 May 2024 18:47:53 -0700
Pluted Pup <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:

On Mon, 06 May 2024 17:37:45 -0700, Rhino wrote:
 

It seems that common terms like "lion" and "elephant" are now
considered inappropriate for these animals. Or so this article would
have us believe as it tells us what terms we SHOULD be using:
>
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/bbc-is-lost-for-words-over-elephant/
>
I've never heard of this website/organization
(conservativewoman.co.uk) and I'm pretty sure this article is
actually a spoof in the vein of The Babylon Bee but you be the
judge. The proposals certainly resemble the kinds of things we seek
from wokesters all the time. 

 
An interesting comment after a different article:
 
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/invoking-margaret-thatcher-as-an-israel-critic-is-an-insult-to-her-strong-sense-of-justice/
 
"It's Jews who've foisted 3rd world immigrants into Britain,
to avert anti-semitism."
 
Some Jews have acknowledged this publicly, that
Jews demand mass immigration as a weapon against
antisemitism.
 
"If all non-indigenous Muslims were repatriated then the
fear factor would shift back onto Blacks. If all Blacks
were repatriated then hostility would shift onto Indians.
If all Indians were repatriated then hostility would
shift to Jews."
 

So "the Jews" somehow arranged for millions of Muslims to enter the UK
on the theory that this would *REDUCE* anti-Semitism?

You must really take them for morons....

A very Jewish idea, to transport millions of
people as immigrants to serve as pawns to Jews.
Well there is a good idea to help different people
get along better and that idea is antisemitism.
Only antisemitism can be a unifying factor,
as Jews see us as all as nothing but useless toys to
chew up and spit out.
 
 

--
Rhino