Re: GUILTY. All 34 counts.

On 6/1/24 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Jun 1, 2024 at 1:26:14 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
 

On 6/1/24 12:14 AM, shawn wrote:

  On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 02:43:16 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
  <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
 

  shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

  Sat, 1 Jun 2024 10:54:32 +1200, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

  On 2024-05-31 10:46:00 +0000, FPP said:

  On 5/31/24 4:48 AM, trotsky wrote:

  On 5/30/24 4:17 PM, FPP wrote:

>

  GUILTY. All 34 counts.

>

  I called it. Let the whining begin!

>

  Yup... I was shooting for Friday.  Really surprised, since a half hour
  before, the judge was shutting it down for the day.

>

  Trump the Chump's whining startedd immediately and his braindead
  supports declared "war" not long after.

>

  Not that this decision means anything in reality. The whole mess will
  drag on for years longer yet with numerous appeals, counter-appeals,
  etc. Trump the Chump and most of the witnesses will be dead of old age
  before it ends, and even then you'll probably have their kids trying to
  clear their names one way or another.

>

  Not that long but yes, it will likely go on for a couple of years.
  There are two level of appeals at the NY state level and then Trump
  can try to jump to the US Supreme Court if both levels of appeal fail
  to overturn the verdict.

>
  There's no direct appeal from state court to federal court. They have to
  find a federal issue to dispute.

    Yes, but as a federal prosecutor (former) pointed out today it is a
  potential last stop. His point was that with this makeup of a Supreme
  Court it's entirely possible they would find a reason to hear the case
  if it gets that far.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfMgcR0XJhg

>
Hopefully Alito and Thomas will be disbarred before then because that's
what they deserve.

 Even if they are, Hutt, you monstrous offal worm, that won't take them off the
Court.

I know, I was just trolling you so I could call you a dickhead directly instead of indirectly. And you went for it hook, line, and stinker!!
There's no constitutional requirement that a Supreme Court justice be a

licensed attorney. The president can nominate literally anyone to be a justice
and if the Senate confirms them, they're on the Court.

Oh don't I know!  Who can forget starting the right wing trend of making a mockery of what used to be the most well respected court in the entire world with this:
Harriet Miers Supreme Court nomination
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Harriet_Miers_Supreme...
On October 3, 2005, Harriet Miers was nominated for Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court by President George W. Bush to replace retired Associate ...
‎Selection process · ‎Miers's background · ‎Education · ‎Nomination issues
She had no qualifications other than being a Dubya groupie and was quickly told to fuck off.  Tell us more about it why don't you dumbfuck.