Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets

On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:39:01 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

On 6/4/24 12:56 AM, shawn wrote:

 On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:43:47 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
 

 In article <v3lkv6$3jgk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 

 On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote:

 On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:15:02 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
 wrote:
 

 On 6/3/2024 3:58 AM, trotsky wrote:

 On 6/2/24 7:41 PM, FPP wrote:

 On 6/2/24 11:53 AM, trotsky wrote:

 On 6/2/24 8:25 AM, FPP wrote:

 On 6/1/24 1:39 PM, trotsky wrote:

 On 6/1/24 11:26 AM, moviePig wrote:

 On 6/1/2024 4:43 AM, trotsky wrote:

 On 5/31/24 5:34 AM, FPP wrote:

 On 5/31/24 4:16 AM, trotsky wrote:

 On 5/30/24 9:53 AM, FPP wrote:

 On 5/30/24 4:31 AM, trotsky wrote:

 On 5/29/24 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even
 allowed to have
 playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's
 basketball has been
 using them since 1982, 42 years.
 
 Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in
 2021 where they
 talked about who they were choosing in their brackets.
 
 https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409
 
 Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past
 and Kamala
 gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is
 going on in the
 White House?

 
 
 What the hell is going on with Trump's impending conviction?
 Oh, and besides Trump who do you think makes the GOP look
 worse, Santos or McCarthy?
 

 
 
 Harris owned up to the mistake, and explained it... but you
 won't hear that in Thanny's False Equivalency Gazette.

 
 
 I'm not a fan of hers but she is upstanding in that way. The
 GOP isn't upstanding in any way. My biggest regret is that
 Trump likely won't be sentenced to jail time.
 

 
 Don't be too sure. He's shown no remorse, and he did violate
 gag orders 10 or 11 times. Those are big mitigating circumstances.
 
 I could see him serving weekends as a punishment. And even
 community service, which would absolutely humiliate him to death.
 
 Fact is, he's going to get some form of punishment.

 
 
 Judge Merchan is very cool. It's hard to read how he'll react on
 this one. Your points are well taken though, he should be
 sentence accordingly for those reasons. I'm thinking he'll get
 sentenced to home confinement with an ankle bracelet.

 
 The choice of punishment could reasonably consider a convict's
 likelihood to re-offend. Since Trump's conviction was ultimately
 about election interference, the judge might notice that Trump
 currently stands accused of at least two other instances of
 exactly that.

 
 Is that your supposition or have you heard that somewhere else?
 

 It's all part of the calculation. Trump is pushing his luck, and if
 he gets time, it'll all be because he's been asking for it.
 
 I could see him doing weekends in jail. That wouldn't hurt his
 campaigning, and would teach him to shut his yap.

 
 To be fair anybody else in the world who acted as flagrantly as Trump
 would be hung out to dry--why should the fat orange weasel get any
 preferential treatment?
 

 Because what the justice system gets away with in low profile cases
 they can't get away with here.
 
 They're bending over backwards to avoid even the appearance of not
 giving him every break possible.
 
 Sure, it's stupid... because they're going to do it anyway.

 
 That's why I think home confinement with a really large ankle bracelet
 might be the choice

 

 I wonder if they make bejewelled 24K ankle bracelets...
 

 They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the Secret
 Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the country. Most
 likely he would get home confinement to Mar-A-Largo which isn't really
 home confinement. Other than his inability to travel to do rallys.
 It's not like being confined to a 2 bedroom home.
 

 Who says?  You?
 
 Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the convict get
 to choose his jailers now?
 
 Why Mar-a-Lago?  Why not Trump Tower?
 He committed the crime in New York. He was indicted and convicted in
 New York.  Why shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York?
 
 Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts tell you?
 Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?

 
 FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to Dems
 and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the attributions
from now on before going full froth.

 
 When someone is foaming at the mouth they tend to attack anyone that
 gets near.
 
 As for why Mar-A_Largo and not Trump Tower I only suggested it because
 that is where Trump officially calls his home now. In reality does it
 really matter if he gets home confinement at Trump Tower or
 Mar-A-Largo? Either way it's not the sort of confinement that one of
 us would experience if we were confined to our homes.
 
 Or maybe I'm just running a long con as part of my support for Dear
 Leader?
 

Naah... that was my fuckup.  That last paragraph was meant for
Thanniford.

The last paragraph was for me, despite the fact that I hadn't suggested any of
things you were disputing in the paragraph or even weighed in AT ALL on the
subject of how Trump will serve his sentence if his conviction is upheld. Good
one, Effa. True to form.

I'm reading with one eye closed before bedtime. The rest
applies to you, though.
 
Yes, it matters.  Mar-a-Lago is a resort, with all the amenities
including golf course.

Nope. There is no golf course at Mar-a-Lago.

Here's an overhead shot of it. Point out the golf course.

https://ibb.co/N2b7PNB

Trump Tower is a floor, an apartment. No sun,
no golf, no omelette bar, no adoring crowds in the main ballroom.

The residence is actually three floors, including a rooftop garden, pool and
reception area. There's also the equivalent of a ballroom on one of the other
20 floors the Trump Organization owns below the penthouse.

So you're wrong about the sun, the omelette bar and the ballroom. You got the
golf right, but there's no golf at either property, so it's a distinction
without a difference.