Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a tv |
On 6/20/24 9:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Now I find myself wondering if he thinks he's a lawyer because he's watched a fair number of Perry Mason reruns.In article <v52k31$2qnl3$10@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Sure we do.
wrote:
>On 6/18/24 9:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v4t1nu$1ig6v$2@dont-email.me>,
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:>So, this 15-sec. video is a lie?>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brrecvXhRVc
I don't know what you're talking about. You can clearly see the bump
device using the recoil (and Newton's Third Law) to reset the trigger
after every round.Again, you say "reset" to avoid telling the truth. The stock does the>
trigger action, obviating the need to have separate trigger pulls
A semi-auto rifle physically cannot fire without a separate trigger pull
and reset for every round. Which means it's not a machine gun per the
Act.
>This is the point. A bump stock emulates a machine gun, making the>
output the same (or close enough) to be covered by the intent of the law.
We don't decide cases on intent.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.