Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple

In article <v5i28t$2b8qj$3@dont-email.me>,
  moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 6/26/2024 5:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v5huvd$2aohk$1@dont-email.me>,
   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 6/25/2024 11:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v5fvh9$1uphg$4@dont-email.me>,
    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

 

In the circumstances you yourself paint, there's obviously no such
thing as "*JUST* holding a gun".

>

Were the rooftop Koreans during the Rodney King riots criminals?

>
I don't remember what you're talking about ...but possibly they were
threatening deadly force.

>
Google it.
>
Theirs were among the only stores in those neighborhoods not looted
and/or burned, so apparently whatever they were threatening, it was
justified.

>
Many obscenely wrong measures can be effective without being justified.

>
So they should have just let their property and livelihoods be destroyed
to protect the poor wittle rioters from feeling skeered?
>
What exactly is "obscenely wrong" about arming yourself in the middle of
a violent riot and defending yourself and your property?
>
Why are you always on the side of the shitbags of this world?

>
I'm not on anyone's "side"

 And yet your objections always seem to favor the side of the shitbag.
Like here, where you call perfectly reasonable and morally justifiable
actions of self-defense "obscenely wrong".