Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban

In article <v5i1n1$2b8qj$1@dont-email.me>,
  moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 6/26/2024 5:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v5hv3j$2aohk$2@dont-email.me>,
   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 6/25/2024 11:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v5fulk$1uphg$1@dont-email.me>,
    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 6/25/2024 6:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v5feln$1ns3d$4@dont-email.me>,
     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 6/25/2024 3:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v54t46$3bnc4$2@dont-email.me>,
      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>

What official verbiage defines "a function of the trigger"?

>
Just that: completion of a full cycle of function.
     

If it's different for full-auto, why not for bump-stocks?

>
The definition is not different for full-auto. A full cycle of
function
of the trigger with an automatic rifle just produces different
results
than it does with a semi-auto.

>
But bump-stock results are the *same* as full-auto. Your consecration
of the almighty trigger would allow me, e.g., to affix a vibrating
rubber "finger" to my semi-auto...

>
Yep. Or just pull it really fast yourself.

>
Hey, what about eliminating the trigger, like BLACK SUNDAY (1977)?

>
That flechette weapon did indeed have a trigger.

>
You mean a 'button'?

>
The button only closed the circuit on the mechanism.

>
What did the "mechanism" do that made it, and nothing else, a trigger?

 Initiated the weapon.