Re: If Biden Loses Televised Debate, Can He Be Replaced?

In article <6j748j91cj94cs9t35eipapqd3ucaltjbt@4ax.com>,
 shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 23:23:49 +0000, BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
 

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:56:19 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
 

On Jun 30, 2024 at 3:40:41 PM PDT, "shawn"
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
 

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:32:34 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
 

On Jun 29, 2024 at 2:57:55 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
 

On 6/28/24 10:49 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <i18t7jdt9idsgamt2nrt6dctolugp38s76@4ax.com>,
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:01:49 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:

 

Earlier this month, Business Insider offered these possible
replacements for Biden should he not be the nominee: Kamala
Harris, governors Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI),
Roy Cooper (D-N.C.), and Wes Moore (D-MD), and senators Amy
Klobuchar (D-MN) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.)

 
The knives are out already.

 
Gavvy Newsom and Hillary were probably watching the debate from their
respective lairs and whispering "Excellent" over their tented fingers
in their best Monty Burns voice.

 
What did they say after your guy Trump claimed (again) that Dems want
to kill babies after they're born?

 
Leftists like Hutt are calling what Trump said about "post-birth"
abortions and Ralph Northam a lie. Here's then-governor of Virginia
Northam in his own words. You tell me what he's talking about if
Trump was lying.

 
So that one guy represents all Dems?

 
Trump specifically said Northam wanted post-birth abortions. Leftists
went nuts and said that was a lie.
 
If it's a lie, what is Northam talking about there?

 
My point is Trump keeps saying Democrats want post-birth abortions.
It's not Democrats, but at most one Democrat that said such a thing.

>
Gavvy Newsom has also made similar remarks. He's talked about amending the
California penal code so that such post-birth abortions won't fall under
the definition of murder, which killing a living baby outside the womb most
certainly is.

 
If the doctors, and the mother think a baby isn't viable is it really
that wrong to terminate the baby's life? That's not an abortion. It's
the so called mercy killing but one that is or should be done within
the law.

So it's okay to kill retarded people because they won't have a full life
anyway and they'll just be burden on the parents?