Re: John Oliver's Lies are Finally EXPOSED by a 14 Year Old Girl

On 2024-12-04 5:52 PM, moviePig wrote:

On 12/4/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Dec 4, 2024 at 1:34:15 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
>

On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 16:26:18 -0500, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-12-04 3:43 PM, moviePig wrote:

  On 12/4/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

  On Dec 4, 2024 at 1:30:43 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net>
  wrote:
>

  A High School athlete gave a speech, which proves just how wrong John
  Oliver was.
>
  https://youtu.be/Gj8LTs-tUSI?si=DWJMYU65CAWjEHxH

>
  The "it's really not that common so we shouldn't worry about it"
  excuse is particularly fucked up.
>
  How many young girls need to suffer injuries before we're allowed to care
  about it, John?
>
  The United Nations put our a report a few weeks ago that said in the
  last two
  years, over 600 medals in various competitions had been awarded to troons
  competing as women. That's 600 women who otherwise would have won a
  championship and who were denied the opportunity by a dude in a skirt.
>
  Is 600 enough for us to care, John? Or does it need to be 1000? Maybe
  10,000?
  What's the number above which John Oliver and the rest of the lunatic
  wokies will allow us to care about this bullshit?

  How unfortunate that Oliver's show just began its seasonal hiatus...

The only thing unfortunate about it is that the hiatus is seasonal,
rather than permanent.

>
I agree. The show should permanently on air, year round. Great idea.

>
Not sure why Oliver's show being on hiatus is even relevant to what I wrote in
the first place, but such are the mysteries of moviePig.

 Your video specifically attacks Oliver, and would, I'm guessing, be summarily dealt with if it came to his attention.

I'm sure he deals with each and every criticism of his show individually, regardless of the critic, including people who say things on Usenet....

In the meantime, Oliver claims that the frequency of such upstart transsexual incursions is "vanishingly small", which your video conspicuously doesn't refute.

The number of genocides Adolf Hitler initiated is also vanishingly small - two (counting the Jews and the gypsies) - so I guess that makes him okay too then?

Personally, *I* remain open to any thoughtful analysis more comprehensive than a tearful teen learning some facts about "fairness".
 

And who would satisfy you as being a fair analyst if an actual living breathing victim doesn't meet your criteria?
--
Rhino