Sujet : Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women!
De : weberm (at) *nospam* polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 28. Jan 2025, 20:35:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnbbhg$1vb08$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/27/2025 2:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
"moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/27/2025 12:03 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
"moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/26/2025 9:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
"moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
"moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high
ground.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI
Love Riley. She speaks facts.
>
What law forces a declaration of gender at birth?
I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law
stopping grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by
exposing themselves in women's private restrooms and changing
rooms, and keeping men from taking trophies, scholarships, and
other benefits in sports by pretending to be women.
This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth.
>
Maybe I misunderstood. I thought the issue came down to who's male
and who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other.
If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face
in the women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is
there.
>
I'm not sure it *is* all that certain.
Of course you're not. What's brutally obvious to normal people
continually eludes you.
E.g., *any* uninvited crotch in *anyone's* face is problematic.
Regardless, I think the particular social mores you want enforced
would need you to define, in unambiguous legalese, who's male and
who's female. Imo, that won't be trivial.
>
Rather than resort to ad hominem, why not state the "brutally obvious"?
The man had his penis exposed in a women's locker room.
>
And that runs afoul of what (proposed?) statute? E.g., what about a
*woman* who exposes her (new) penis in a women's locker room?
>
Point being that it's not enough merely to say something disgusts you...
>
Imagine, you attempting to make the obvious confusing....
That's his tell for whenever he has lost a debate.
[Kerman's incorrect foramtting fixed.]
-- Not a joke! Don't jump!
Riley Gaines advocates for women!
Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women!
