Re: OT: "Free speech" becomes a verb & noun...

On Feb 6, 2025 at 7:02:46 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 18:52:29 -0800, BTR1701 wrote:
 

 On Feb 5, 2025 at 4:14:07 PM PST, "moviePig"<nobody@nowhere.com>  wrote:
 
 > On 2/5/2025 6:32 PM, Pluted Pup wrote:
 > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 20:37:20 -0800, moviePig wrote:
 > >
 > > >
 > > > "Trump administration to cancel student visas of pro-Palestinian

protesters"

 > >
 > > Egregious, but no where is that quote in the article you cited:
 > >
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-cancel-student-visas-all-hamas-sympathizers-white-house-2025-01-29/

 > >
 > > That article appears to be about whether Trump wants to
 > > militarily invade Palestine to expel the people from Gaza.
 >
 > Interesting. Looks like Reuters may have retracted (incompetently) the
 > original article, which was headlined as I quoted. The new emphasis
 > would now appear to be on "pro-Hamas" rather than "pro-Palestinian".
 > Regardless, it still smacks of curtailment of free speech.
 
 So even when they clarify that they're only going after those resident
aliens
 who support a terrorist organization, you're still worried about their free
 speech rights.
 
 > (I.e., one could support *some* of Hamas's stated goals without bombing Tel
 > Aviv.)
 
 And one could support those goals without expressing support for Hamas but
 they choose to do the latter.

 
Bogus! You've implied it is impossible to criticize Israel without
supporting Hamas

>
I have done no such thing.
>