Re: [OT] Canada is not a serious country

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:44:52 -0800, Pluted Pup wrote:

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 03:23:18 -0800, Rhino wrote:
>

I read this story in the National Post and found myself shaking my head:
>
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/syrian-canadian-who-allegedly-let-relative-use-his-passport-wins-chance-to-get-it-back
>
This guy seriously misused his passport - from the looks of it, very
deliberately - and the court has essentially said it was mean of the
passport office to treat him the way they did.

>
One judge makes a questionable decision and that means
Canada is not a serious country?
>

>
They SHOULD have deported both individuals and never let them back into
the country: that's what a serious country would have done.

>
Might be, might not. That's why it is questionable. Is
there a particular reason these two should be singled out
by a capricious legal system that let's so many get away with
doing the same crimes, and is this reason Israel?

How ignorant of me to say "capricious", Canada's legal
system is systematic, like ours, with little leeway
for judges. The official statement of the government
is that immigration is always good, so crimes
involving immigrants must be accepted and prosecuted
at discount rates.

>
It might disappoint you to know, that Israel also has courts
that make questionable legal decisions, in case you're suggesting
that Canada would be better off managed by Israel.