Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a tv 
Sujet : Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"
De : nanoflower (at) *nospam* notforg.m.a.i.l.com (shawn)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 07. Apr 2025, 20:43:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <sca8vjd61c978aq0au7nmatgm0jkihurqb@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 19:19:29 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut.
>
Here's a citation to the story Ubi the shithead plagarized.
>
https://www.dailywire.com/news/regular-msnbc-guest-all-laws-passed-before-1965-should-be-presumptively-unconstitutional
>
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Apr 7, 2025 at 1:30:50 AM PDT, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>

Mystal often appears on MSNBC, and even joined network host and former
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele just two days prior to
joining THE VIEW. During that appearance, he claimed that the Trump
administration's efforts to deport criminal illegal aliens and gang members
amounted to "fascism".
>
Yes, it's fascist to take a violent thug who snuck into the country illegally
and then committed more crimes against Americans while here, and send his ass
back to wherever he came from.
>
Sure.  <rolls eyes>
>
Did any of these men have a final order of removal? Trump doesn't say.
We know in one prominent case, the man had an order from an immigration
judge that he was NOT subject to removal (as long as he didn't violate
conditions of humanitarian parole).
>
Let's retain probable cause, shall we? Prosecute the fuckers for crimes
committed in the United States upon indictment with probable cause.
Trump doesn't present evidence in court 'cuz there ain't none.
>

Don't forget that there's apparently no process in place to release
someone once they are deported. At least it is being claimed that they
have no means to get El Salvador to release someone once in their
custody. So even if the Trump administration was to admit to having
sent someone to El Salvador who was innocent there would be nothing
they can do.

Though isn't El Salvador being paid to keep these people in their
custody. Which would mean that even if El Salvador were to refuse to
release someone to the US custody (unlikely) they aren't going to keep
holding on to those prisoners if the USA stopped paying.

You can't defend Trump on this.
>
Literally everything is "fascist" to these people now. Most of them
don't even know what the word actually means.
>
Of course this is moviePig language, but Trump is merely removing
people. Where's the promised transparency?
>
It's a coverup.

Hell, they didn't even want to admit to removing the guy. Apparently
we only know they did so because his wife saw him in one of the pics.

So no transparency at all.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Apr 25 * Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"10Adam H. Kerman
7 Apr 25 +* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"5shawn
28 Apr 25 i+- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Rhino
28 Apr 25 i`* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"3Adam H. Kerman
28 Apr 25 i +- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1suzeeq
16 May 25 i `- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Adam H. Kerman
7 Apr 25 `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"4BTR1701
7 Apr 25  `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"3Adam H. Kerman
28 Apr 25   `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"2Adam H. Kerman
16 May 25    `- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Adam H. Kerman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal