Re: Deportation of Khalil

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a tv 
Sujet : Re: Deportation of Khalil
De : nanoflower (at) *nospam* notforg.m.a.i.l.com (shawn)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 13. Apr 2025, 21:40:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <dm7ovjlgeb4ni73gh6djpgn9h8q2mbps4r@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 14:19:59 -0400, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

On 2025-04-12 11:29 PM, Robin Miller wrote:
Adam H. Kerman wrote:
 
I despise Khalil. He's espousing anti-Western and anti-Israeli values and
is acting, effectively, as a spokesman for Hamas, It's a
misrepresentation to call him "pro Palestinian" as taking the Hamas side
is anti-Palestinian.
 
 
These are all lies. Khalil's position is to oppose Israel's genocide in
Gaza, which is the only moral position to take. Numerous Jewish groups
have taken the same position; Jewish groups have often led campus
protests. Anyone who supports Israel in its genocide is siding with
ideological descendants of Nazis.

If that is the case then it should be easy enough to prove. Either
he's been out there supporting Hamas in public or he hasn't.

 
If Hamas had taken the honourable - and legally required - approach to
war, none of this "genocide" would have happened. They would have put
their fighters in uniform and fought away from civilian areas instead of
deliberately hiding among the civilian population and civilian
infrastructure. But they didn't.

They would have lost on the first day because Israel is just that much
better armed and trained. It's why they are hiding among the civilian
population in the hopes that will help protect them. It shows that
they are willing to sacrifice their fellow Palestinians in order to
keep themselves safe.

That doesn't support their own attack on Israel civilians. That takes
them from soldiers fighting a war to terrorists who deserve what ever
they get. Not that the Palestinians they hide amongst are deserving of
suffering with Hamas.
If Hamas cared about the citizens they represent, they would have let
them shelter in the extensive tunnel network that they built under Gaza,
rather than forbidding them to do so because the tunnels were reserved
for fighters and rockets. But they didn't.

That would have been better but it likely would have just led to
Israel using bunker busting type bombs to get at the people in the
tunnels.

If Hamas wanted to end the suffering and death, they would have given up
the hostages months ago and laid down their arms. But they didn't.

I wouldn't expect them to put down their arms so long as Israel is
treating the Palestinians as they are. That said I don't see the point
in holding on to the hostages. It doesn't give them the sort of
leverage they hoped for and just provides Netenyahoo (yeah, I know it
isn't his name) cover for doing what he and his far right supporters
want.

If Hamas had a shred of honesty, they would have ensured that the health
ministry in Gaza - which is run by Hamas - wouldn't be exaggerated and
would distinguish between dead fighters and dead civilians. But they
didn't.

Probably because they think that strengthens their position. No idea
if it helps or not but at least I can see why they would do that. Also
why would you give your enemy information on how effective their
attacks have been. That's never been a good idea.


The government's position that a protestor at a university "would have
potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United
States" is preposterous on its face. Rubio's statement contained no
evidence for his assertion.
 
More generally, the contention that people legally in the US can be
thrown out of the country--or legally harmed in any way--for taking a
political position different from that of the government effectively
nullifies the First Amendment.
 
Those two paragraphs are essentially what Adam are saying.

>
The more extreme that Israel becomes, the more extreme becomes the
repression by governments allied to Israel--and the fanaticism of
Israel's supporters.
 
Zionism is a genocidal political philosophy that must be eradicated.
 
>
BTR1701 responded to that point already and I have nothing to add to his
response.
>
Mahmoud Khalil has gone beyond just speech, as Douglas Murray points out
in this video:
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCWjWAiAIG4 [8 minutes]
>
(Be patient, he gets there....)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Apr 25 * Deportation of Khalil25Adam H. Kerman
13 Apr 25 `* Re: Deportation of Khalil24Robin Miller
13 Apr 25  +* Re: Deportation of Khalil2BTR1701
13 Apr 25  i`- Re: Deportation of Khalil1Adam H. Kerman
13 Apr 25  +- Re: Deportation of Khalil1Pluted Pup
13 Apr 25  +* Re: Deportation of Khalil10Adam H. Kerman
13 Apr 25  i+- Re: Deportation of Khalil1Rhino
13 Apr 25  i`* Re: Deportation of Khalil8suzeeq
13 Apr 25  i `* Re: Deportation of Khalil7moviePig
13 Apr 25  i  `* Re: Deportation of Khalil6Rhino
13 Apr 25  i   +- Re: Deportation of Khalil1moviePig
13 Apr 25  i   +* Re: Deportation of Khalil2suzeeq
13 Apr 25  i   i`- Re: Deportation of Khalil1moviePig
13 Apr 25  i   `* Re: Deportation of Khalil2Adam H. Kerman
13 Apr 25  i    `- Re: Deportation of Khalil1Robin Miller
13 Apr 25  `* Re: Deportation of Khalil10Rhino
13 Apr 25   +- Re: Deportation of Khalil1Rhino
13 Apr 25   +* Re: Deportation of Khalil6EGK
13 Apr 25   i`* Re: Deportation of Khalil5moviePig
13 Apr 25   i +* Re: Deportation of Khalil2Rhino
13 Apr 25   i i`- Re: Deportation of Khalil1moviePig
13 Apr 25   i `* Re: Deportation of Khalil2BTR1701
13 Apr 25   i  `- Re: Deportation of Khalil1moviePig
13 Apr 25   `* Re: Deportation of Khalil2shawn
13 Apr 25    `- Re: Deportation of Khalil1Rhino

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal