Re: [OT] Zuckerberg gets hung out to dry by whistle-blower

In <vtuge2$3sl3h$1@dont-email.me> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> writes:
[snip]

Kong AND Taiwan. Senator Blumenthal pointed out that Zuck had told the
Senate in previous testimony that no such activities took place. She's
essentially exposed him as lying to the Senate and betraying customers
in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZzxxLqWKOE [10 minutes]
 
I'm not sure how he's going to deal with this mess. He's got lots of
money, power, and influence so he's got lots of levers to pull. If I
were the whistle-blower, I would keep a VERY low profile, just in case
Zuck decides that an "unfortunate accident" would be a good idea.

What would be the point in whacking her now? You only whack someone to keep
them from exposing you. She's already spilled the beans.

Just like why does a loan shark (per tv and movies..) kill the
patsy who owes him $50k and then won't get the money.

It's to warn other delinquents...





--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
     dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]