Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a tv 
Sujet : Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 28. Apr 2025, 21:10:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vuonb5$2hbg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:16:01 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:

Go bigger!

There were no blacks in Europe during the Age of Enlightenment! It's all
invalid. Western civilization has been returned to the Dark Ages!

Really? There were blacks in England in the 14th century which is well
before "Enlightenment"

Only in the Shondaverse!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Apr 25 * Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"10Adam H. Kerman
7 Apr 25 +* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"5shawn
28 Apr 25 i+- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Rhino
28 Apr 25 i`* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"3Adam H. Kerman
28 Apr 25 i +- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1suzeeq
16 May 25 i `- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Adam H. Kerman
7 Apr 25 `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"4BTR1701
7 Apr 25  `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"3Adam H. Kerman
28 Apr 25   `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"2Adam H. Kerman
16 May 25    `- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Adam H. Kerman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal