Sujet : Re: ping BTR1701
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 16. May 2025, 19:27:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1008021$3ses2$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
shawn <
nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
Fri, 16 May 2025 13:59:50 -0400, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>:
2025-05-16 1:16 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
Amazon grocery delivery service briefly as it turned out, lowered their
minimum order for free delivery to $50 from multiple hundreds. So I tried
it a couple weeks ago and they not only added on a seven dollar delivery
fee but they added on a five dollar tip neither of which they told you
about until you got the receipt after you got the groceries. They then
raised the minimum order up to 100 bucks.
I contested the delivery fee and got it refunded, but I let the tip slide
because I figured it wasn’t the delivery person‘s fault
Good on you for contesting the delivery fee. Free means free so the idea
of them charging you $7 for free delivery is ridiculous.
As for letting the tip slide, I agree, it wasn't the delivery person's
fault. (I'm assuming it was a human making the delivery, not some kind
of robot.)
That assumes the tip is going to the delivery person. Something I
would have believed a few decades ago but now I wouldn't trust.
Good point. DoorDash got caught failing to remit tips it collected over
several years. There was a class action lawsuit.