Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a tv 
Sujet : Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 16. May 2025, 21:19:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10086ko$3udd1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 20:30:24 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:

Does the US have a clause saying all non-citizens convicted of an
offense with a maximum sentence over ___ years (in Canada it's 5
years) are automatically deported at end of sentence (which may not be
actually _____ years given early release or parole rules)?

Deportation isn't automatic. There's a hearing.

The two main categories of crimes that can put you at risk of
being deported are aggravated felonies and crimes involving
moral turpitude. The Immigration and Nationality Act also
enumerates certain crimes that serve as independent grounds of
deportation, even if they are not classified in one of those two
categories.

https://www.justia.com/immigration/deportation-removal/criminal-grounds-for-deportation/

Am surprised - usually US courts are more bloody minded that Canadian
courts where the judge does not have authority to deny a deportation
order for someone convicted of a major offence (which I >think< is any
crime carrying a sentence of 3 years or more).

Now getting the order and actully executing the order are two
different things....

Just to clarify: It's not a federal court. Congress didn't give
jurisdication over immigration to federal courts. Deportations are
ordered at administrative hearings.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Apr 25 * Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"10Adam H. Kerman
7 Apr 25 +* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"5shawn
28 Apr 25 i+- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Rhino
28 Apr 25 i`* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"3Adam H. Kerman
28 Apr 25 i +- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1suzeeq
16 May 25 i `- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Adam H. Kerman
7 Apr 25 `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"4BTR1701
7 Apr 25  `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"3Adam H. Kerman
28 Apr 25   `* Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"2Adam H. Kerman
16 May 25    `- Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"1Adam H. Kerman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal