Sujet : Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 16. May 2025, 21:23:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10086rk$3udd1$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
The Horny Goat <
lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 20:10:13 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:16:01 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
Go bigger!
There were no blacks in Europe during the Age of Enlightenment! It's all
invalid. Western civilization has been returned to the Dark Ages!
Really? There were blacks in England in the 14th century which is well
before "Enlightenment"
Only in the Shondaverse!
Not according to Black Tudors the Untold Story (which I've read)
https://nvdplib.ca.iiivega.com/search/card?id=ee9753d8-5451-5bcf-8643-236180514525&entityType=FormatGroup
I know. Shonda Rhimes cited this to prove her drama -- with modern
sensibilities and modern hair -- is historically accurate. Anything that
might resemble history is the merest of coincidence.
Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"
Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"
