Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a tv 
Sujet : Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 22. May 2025, 21:50:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100o2nf$3l9hv$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

My brother had always been in charge of paying the internet but he had a
fatal car crash back in February and I hadn't quite got around to
getting the bills re-organized. . . .

I don't recall if I said something at the time you first mentioned the
death of your brother, but I'm very sorry to hear this. Best wishes to
you and your family.

In the other followup, I should have commented on the need to keep any
of your brother's phone numbers active, if that's still possible, or his
email addresses. We all identify ourselves with phone numbers and email
addresses on accounts we hold, making it super easy for someone who
learns of an old phone number or email address to commit fraud. To get
an account changed or re-established, the fraudster just needs one piece
of identifying information.

Since I subrscribe to VoIP.ms, based in Montreal, it's super cheap to
hold phone numbers. I have a six-line SIP conference phone plus a
business line on an ATA that does SIP and now, a fax line. I spend $75
to $100 a year but I have to provide the separate broadband connection.
Plus I've got a two-line ATA that I use for two Google voice lines, each
for a separate small nonprofit. There's the cable phone line and two
cell phones.

If I were keeping old phone numbers, I'd port them to a VoIP service.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 May 25 * [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse21Rhino
22 May 25 +* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse16Adam H. Kerman
22 May 25 i`* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse15Rhino
22 May 25 i `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse14Adam H. Kerman
22 May 25 i  +- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1danny burstein
22 May 25 i  `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse12Rhino
23 May 25 i   +* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse3Adam H. Kerman
23 May 25 i   i`* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse2Rhino
23 May 25 i   i `- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Adam H. Kerman
23 May 25 i   `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse8shawn
23 May 25 i    +* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse6BTR1701
23 May 25 i    i+* military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse4danny burstein
23 May 25 i    ii+- Re: military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1BTR1701
23 May 25 i    ii+- Re: military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino
23 May 25 i    ii`- Re: military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1shawn
23 May 25 i    i`- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Adam H. Kerman
23 May 25 i    `- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino
22 May 25 +- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino
22 May 25 `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse3Adam H. Kerman
22 May 25  `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse2Rhino
23 May 25   `- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal