military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a tv 
Sujet : military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse
De : dannyb (at) *nospam* panix.com (danny burstein)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 23. May 2025, 03:08:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <100olbo$cuq$1@reader1.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : nn/6.7.3
In <100okul$3oppn$1@dont-email.me> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> writes:

[snip]

I think you fail to see the obvious answer. If your country were truly
to move away from the F-35 then there's no reason to keep them. Just
sell them to another country that is using the fighters. I'm sure
there will be many willing buyers.

Weapons sales tend to come with a "you can't sell this stuff to anyone else"
clause in the contract. We only want those things going to certain countries.

Certainly true, but if Lower Slobovia decides to
transfer some of their US sourced tanks to Freedonia,
what can the US do (within reason...) to stop them?

Yes, the US can refuse to sell any more tanks, and
can end replacement parts/repairs, but that's not
going to physically stop the handover today...



--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
     dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 May 25 * [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse21Rhino
22 May 25 +* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse16Adam H. Kerman
22 May 25 i`* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse15Rhino
22 May 25 i `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse14Adam H. Kerman
22 May 25 i  +- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1danny burstein
22 May 25 i  `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse12Rhino
23 May 25 i   +* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse3Adam H. Kerman
23 May 25 i   i`* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse2Rhino
23 May 25 i   i `- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Adam H. Kerman
23 May 25 i   `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse8shawn
23 May 25 i    +* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse6BTR1701
23 May 25 i    i+* military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse4danny burstein
23 May 25 i    ii+- Re: military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1BTR1701
23 May 25 i    ii+- Re: military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino
23 May 25 i    ii`- Re: military weapons, was: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1shawn
23 May 25 i    i`- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Adam H. Kerman
23 May 25 i    `- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino
22 May 25 +- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino
22 May 25 `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse3Adam H. Kerman
22 May 25  `* Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse2Rhino
23 May 25   `- Re: [OT] Bell Canada - service vs. abuse1Rhino

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal