Re: Gas-Powered Vehicles Saved in California

On Sat, 24 May 2025 20:43:57 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:

In article <100onfl$3otbn$3@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

>

Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have
no idea on what basis he plans to sue.  "California has a right, alone
among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't
sound like a winning case to me.

>
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a
real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal
Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing
the head clown....

>
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the
one above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew
he would do this.
>
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for
it again." Drives them nuts.

>
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a
worldwide recession.

>
You do undersdtand that history did not begin when Trump was re-elected,
right?
>
[Kerman's incorrect formstting fixed.]

You've got to give him a break as it's the only time he pays
attention.  TDS is like that.