Re: John Roberts won't save Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia

On Sun, 25 May 2025 18:14:16 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

On May 25, 2025 at 12:26:09 AM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
>

On Sat, 24 May 2025 23:37:51 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
wrote:
 

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 04:17:01 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
 

You do realize the guys they're going after have already had their hearings
and just ignored their deportation orders, right? Do we need to give them
another hearing about the hearing? And then maybe a third hearing to examine
the first and second hearings?

 
If the guy already has had the hearing they're entitled to, what's
left other than execution of the deportation order?
 
Perhaps he might be hauled into court to verify that the deportation
order is valid but at that point he gets cuffs and a one way trip to
either the airport or to the border right?
 
You simply don't have the right to unlimited stays of warrants. I'm
all for due process but you don't have the right to come up with a new
excuse ad infinitum.

 
Putting him into a maximum prison for life isn't exactly the same as
deporting someone.

>
He was deported to his home country. His home country had issues with his gang
affiliation and imposed punishment for it under their laws.
>

Ah, yes, the infamous MS 13 tattoo. Proof positive that some people,
even Presidents, can be fooled but the simplest things.