Re: John Roberts won't save Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

On May 25, 2025 at 12:16:32 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
>

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

On May 25, 2025 at 11:46:20 AM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
 

 On Sun, 25 May 2025 18:14:16 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
 wrote:
 

 On May 25, 2025 at 12:26:09 AM PDT, "shawn"

<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>

 wrote:
 

  On Sat, 24 May 2025 23:37:51 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
  wrote:
 

  On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 04:17:01 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
  wrote:
 

  You do realize the guys they're going after have already had

their hearings

  and just ignored their deportation orders, right? Do we need

to give them

  another hearing about the hearing? And then maybe a third hearing

to examine

  the first and second hearings?

 
  If the guy already has had the hearing they're entitled to, what's
  left other than execution of the deportation order?
 
  Perhaps he might be hauled into court to verify that the deportation
  order is valid but at that point he gets cuffs and a one way trip to
  either the airport or to the border right?
 
  You simply don't have the right to unlimited stays of warrants. I'm
  all for due process but you don't have the right to come up with a new
  excuse ad infinitum.

 
  Putting him into a maximum prison for life isn't exactly the same as
  deporting someone.

 
 He was deported to his home country. His home country had issues with his
 gang
 affiliation and imposed punishment for it under their laws.

 
 Ah, yes, the infamous MS 13 tattoo. Proof positive that some people,
 even Presidents, can be fooled but the simplest things.

 
No, the tattoos are ancillary, even though they do indeed have gang meaning,
it's all the other evidence of his gang affiliation, both in the U.S. and in
El Salvador, that got him thrown in prison back home.

 
It's so strange that none of this evidence can be presented in a court
of law respecting rights.

>
It was presented in some court because the court records is where I read it
documented.

There has been no indictment for the crimes the informant claimed he
committed in New York. There aren't other crimes as a gang member to
indict him for.