Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a tv |
On Jun 9, 2025 at 7:43:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:You seem self-blinded to the complicating factor of humanitarianism ...which, to varying degrees, *everyone's* saddled with.
On 6/9/2025 8:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:I don't wonder it. I acknowledge there are people who believe that the UnitedmoviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:>On 6/9/2025 5:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:They never claimed they wouldn't pursue deportation on every illegal alien.On Jun 9, 2025 at 1:57:24 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:>
>On 6/9/2025 3:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>>>
Lemme get this straight... the open borders crowd cries foul that mean old
ICE is deporting "hard-working families just trying to find a better
life", so
ICE says, okay, we'll shift our focus to deporting the straight-up evil
criminal
shitbag illegal aliens and deport them, and the moviePigs of the world then
say that's *also* unacceptable because it "traps" Democrat politicians into
looking bad when they stand up to oppose ICE.
>
Wow.
"Relax, Trump's monkeys are eating only the *rotten* bananas..."
So we should not enforce the immigration laws of the United States against
anyone at all because at a minimum, it'll trick Democrats into rooting
for the
wrong people.
>
Gotcha.
Sure. If you can buy that Trump won't go after "hard-working families",
you can buy anything.
They said they would prioritize the 600,000 or so illegal alien criminals
that Biden allowed into the country without so much as a routine background
check, but that ultimately anyone who is here illegally is subject to
deportation.
Yet you wonder why some protest ICE arresting even The Dirty Dozen...
States, alone among all the nations of the world, for some reason has no right
to control its own borders or enforce any kind of immigration law. It's
nonsense, it's ridiculous, it's a recipe for national suicide, and it's the
single most significant reason why Trump won the election, but I don't pretend
these people don't exist.
I do, however, wonder why *you* seem to be one of them.
>And, of course, this issue isn't only -- or even mostly -- about "laws".Well, it certainly wasn't about laws during the Biden term, when he and his
government violated an entire title of the U.S. Code and essentially erased
the southern border.
Yes. As I said, it's not solely about the "rule of law".
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.