Sujet : Re: The Schwartz Awakens
De : YourName (at) *nospam* YourISP.com (Your Name)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 14. Jun 2025, 00:37:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102icob$3obsn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-06-13 14:01:21 +0000, Dimensional Traveler said:
On 6/13/2025 12:31 AM, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-06-12 23:38:10 +0000, shawn said:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:13:03 +1200, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
wrote:
On 2025-06-12 22:32:27 +0000, shawn said:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:16:00 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1933196231150641152/vid/ avc1/1920x1080/GIhXgpCvs1JPNj6w.mp4
Glad to see it. I figured it would never happen given his age.
Given Mel Brooks is 92, it may still never happen.
I had that thought but they can still make the move even if Brooks
passes away before the movie is finished.
That would depend on whether whoever takes over sticks to the original Brooks' version or tries to make changes with their own silly ideas.
Not that I care since I found the first movie silly nonsense anyway. :-)
Which is exactly what it was supposed to be.
But there is 'funny" and there is "silly", and then there's "weird" ... silly and weird are not what I like watching. ;-)
The Schwartz Awakens
Re: The Schwartz Awakens