Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a tv |
On Jun 26, 2025 at 2:22:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:But you're speaking as though he were here and speaking for himself.
On 6/26/2025 3:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:No, I've got a digital archive of all my posts. My newsreader auto-copiesOn Jun 17, 2025 at 8:08:53 PM PDT, "BTR1701" <atropos@mac.com> wrote:>
https://ibb.co/RknV5xzrIt's happened again.
>
Misdemeanor charge + $2000 fine
>
https://ibb.co/SD6RcDVp
>
Man in Rhode Island was arrested after he allegedly made a skid mark on a
Pride Rainbow crosswalk with his car.
>
The city allowing a "pride" crosswalk in the first place is a 1A violation.
If
I asked for a permit to paint an anti-troon mural in the crosswalk (or a
pro-gun/2A message), I bet they wouldn't give me one. The government is
allowing some political and social messages but not others based on their
own
politics.
>
Where are the DOJ lawsuits against rainbow murals being painted on city
streets (to the exclusion of all other non-'progressive' messages) and then
treated like religious icons?
>
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1937932161073463297/vid/avc1/1080x1920/6o-22WzrJXx4UGjG.mp4
Teenagers rip up some rainbow flags. Four are arrested and, according to the
Atlanta PD, a manhunt-- yes, you read that right-- is on for the other two.
My first question is, of course, arrested for what?
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989). The Supreme Court ruled that flag
desecration is protected speech under the 1st Amendment: "It's both symbolic
speech and political speech."
If it's legal to desecrate the U.S. flag, it's legal to desecrate the flag
of
the Password People.
"But wait," the apologists like FPP will say, "It's not legal to destroy
something that doesn't belong to you. These kids took those flags off the
streetlight poles! That's a crime!"
While this may be true, it's a crime that's strangely only enforced against
people hostile to the 'progressive' Agenda:
Anti-ICE protester pulls down a U.S. flag from a government pole and burns
it:
no consequences.
Teenager pulls down a gay Rainbow Mafia flag from a government pole and rips
it up: straight to prison.
Afaics, FPP is present only in your recall.
every post I make into a text document on my computer. That necessarily means
I have a whole lot of FPP's claims saved as well, quoted in posts in which I
responded to him.
Well, that "enhancement" structure is twisted logic, imo, but so be it. I'm pointing out that the presence of a flag has no bearing on the actions we'd (presumably) like to discourage.But, no, it's not legal to burn the U.S. flag in a fireworks factory. YourHe can't be charged with only a hate crime. Hate crime is an enhancement to a
rainbow-burning teen
would've been charged with a hate crime, not property destruction.
predicate crime. One has to be charged with a crime first and only then can
the hate enhancement be applied. But nevertheless, the enhancement is for the
speech, the thought, the emotion, therefore speech is being prosecuted. The
extra punishment you get over and above what you would get for the theft of
the flag alone is punishment for your speech, which should not be allowed
under the 1st Amendment.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.