Re: Right to pr0n overruled

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a tv 
Sujet : Re: Right to pr0n overruled
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 30. Jun 2025, 00:34:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103sij2$1p5bg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
ahk@chinet.com wrote:

I've been required to identify myself submitting a scan of a driver's
license and a photograph of my face.

On various Web sites, I've clicked a button "Yes I am over 18" but that
doesn't verify that I am a user who is over 18.

There are third-party verification services. You verify yourself once,
and you're good for any site using that service.

I don't know how much they cost, but I'm generally okay with porn sites
having to bear expenses to be responsible.

One is no longer reading published material with First Amendment protection
anonymously. Before this decision, I would have expected that a state
law requiring verification would have been unconstitutional per strict
scrutiny.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jun 25 * Right to pr0n overruled32Adam H. Kerman
28 Jun 25 +* Re: Right to pr0n overruled26BTR1701
28 Jun 25 i+* Re: Right to pr0n overruled4Adam H. Kerman
28 Jun 25 ii`* Re: Right to pr0n overruled3BTR1701
28 Jun 25 ii `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled2Adam H. Kerman
28 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1BTR1701
29 Jun 25 i`* Re: Right to pr0n overruled21Adam H. Kerman
29 Jun 25 i +- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1Adam H. Kerman
29 Jun 25 i `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled19moviePig
29 Jun 25 i  `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled18BTR1701
29 Jun 25 i   +* Re: Right to pr0n overruled12BTR1701
29 Jun 25 i   i+* Re: Right to pr0n overruled8moviePig
29 Jun 25 i   ii`* Re: Right to pr0n overruled7BTR1701
29 Jun 25 i   ii +* Re: Right to pr0n overruled4Adam H. Kerman
29 Jun 25 i   ii i`* Re: Right to pr0n overruled3Melissa Hollingsworth
30 Jun 25 i   ii i +- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1Adam H. Kerman
17 Jul22:26 i   ii i `- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1super70s
29 Jun 25 i   ii `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled2moviePig
16 Jul 25 i   ii  `- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1moviePig
29 Jun 25 i   i`* Re: Right to pr0n overruled3Adam H. Kerman
29 Jun 25 i   i `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled2BTR1701
29 Jun 25 i   i  `- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1Adam H. Kerman
29 Jun 25 i   `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled5danny burstein
29 Jun 25 i    +* Re: Right to pr0n overruled3Adam H. Kerman
29 Jun 25 i    i`* Re: Right to pr0n overruled2danny burstein
29 Jun 25 i    i `- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1Adam H. Kerman
16 Jul 25 i    `- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1Pluted Pup
29 Jun 25 `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled5Melissa Hollingsworth
29 Jun 25  +- Re: Right to pr0n overruled1Adam H. Kerman
16 Jul 25  `* Re: Right to pr0n overruled3Pluted Pup
16 Jul 25   `* booze and bars, was: Right to pr0n overruled2danny burstein
16 Jul16:53    `- Re: booze and bars1Adam H. Kerman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal