Re: Make It Make Sense

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

On Jul 6, 2025 at 2:52:39 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

Jul 6, 2025 at 12:37:08 PM PDT, shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>:

Sun, 6 Jul 2025 19:07:10 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>:

 

New "make it make sense' subject:

 

The president has five kids, three baby mamas, lives in government housing,
has his own mugshot, yet the Left still hates him.

 

Make it make sense.

 

He's a billionaire so he's automatically on the wrong side.

 

Well, unless that billionaire is named Taylor Swift or George Soros or Oprah
or Bill Gates or Warren Buffet or Beyonce.

 
Unless I missed it, Taylor Swift is in the business of being Taylor
Swift and doesn't overtly promote political causes.

>
No, she came out squarely for Kammie. When she did, the media were giddy about
it and said it was potential death blow to Trump, considering how many
millions of young voters she could influence.

The real Taylor Swift would have written a song about how Kamela
disappointed her and the bloom is off the rose, yet she survived.

She can turn anything into a record sale.

In olden days, we
called such people "Republicans". All she wants to do is write songs
about surviving boyfriends who broke up with her over minor issues and
sell them to her huge audience.
 

The Democrats' public hatred of billionaires is one of their most annoying
hypocrisies. Kamala had more billionaires on her side than Trump did,
yet they constantly spit the word billionaire out of their mouths like
it's solely a loathsome condition of the Right.

 
The Democratic Party was sold at a discount to billionaires. They
already held the Republican Party. The billionaire is on his own side.
The political party is mere convenience.
 
Somehow, Kamala pissed away their contributions so I guess they were
working for Trump after all.

>
>
>