Sujet : Re: Is it really rockabilly? (part... 43?)
De : savoybg (at) *nospam* aol.com (Bruce)
Groupes : rec.music.rock-pop-r+b.1950sDate : 15. Mar 2025, 21:38:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <488bbb696ca0becb93171e92a0c188d2@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 20:32:40 +0000, BobRoman wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 18:45:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
>
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 16:49:56 +0000, BobRoman wrote:
>
But is it rockabilly?
>
I's say yes, but it's not very good.
>
That's probably why he never made a second record.
https://rcs-discography.com/rcs/search.php?type=acode&key=bull5000-- 
Is it really rockabilly? (part... 43?)
Re: Is it really rockabilly? (part... 43?)