Re: Re:Positional/physical addressing

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Re:Positional/physical addressing
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Jun 2025, 17:49:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103ekv7$24a8c$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/24/2025 9:18 AM, Martin Rid wrote:
CAN network?
Each CAN node either needs a unique address to which messages can be
directed;  *or*, to KNOW to listen for particular BROADCAST messages.
So, you either send a message to node 5 to do something
OR, you send a message about that something and expect
that node to know that *it* should process that message.
If all of the nodes are *identical* (hardware and software),
there is nothing to distinguish one device from any other.
If you require an "address"/ID to be programmed into the device
to "make it distinguishable from its neighbors", then you've
added a labor step and a configuration management activity
(how do you know that you don't have two 5's?  how do you know
that the device in your left hand is 5 and your right hand is 23?)
Ideally, you just want the user to reach into a bag of identical
parts and plug them in without concern for which goes where -- and
have the system sort all of that out FOR the user.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Jun 25 * Positional/physical addressing25Don Y
24 Jun 25 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing8Martin Rid
24 Jun 25 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing7Don Y
24 Jun 25 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing6Don Y
24 Jun 25 i  +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Jeroen Belleman
25 Jun18:30 i  i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Ian
25 Jun18:43 i  i +- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun22:29 i  i `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Jeroen Belleman
24 Jun22:36 i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun09:52 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing11Liz Tuddenham
25 Jun10:14 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing10Don Y
25 Jun11:14 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing9Liz Tuddenham
25 Jun18:04 i  `* Re: Positional/physical addressing8Don Y
26 Jun09:59 i   +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Liz Tuddenham
26 Jun10:46 i   i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Don Y
26 Jun17:53 i   i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing2Liz Tuddenham
26 Jun21:48 i   i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
26 Jun20:58 i   +* Re: Positional/physical addressing2bitrex
26 Jun21:50 i   i`- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
26 Jun21:00 i   `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1bitrex
25 Jun18:40 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Ian
25 Jun20:41 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Don Y
25 Jun21:35 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing2Dennis
25 Jun22:53 i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun19:25 `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal