Sujet : Re: Predictive failures
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 17. Apr 2024, 09:56:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1qs5i1v.oaam7t1jq8zlmN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
Don Y <
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
...When I was designing for pharma, my philosophy was
to make it easy/quick to replace the entire control system. Let someone
troubleshoot it on a bench instead of on the factory floor (which is
semi-sterile).
That's fine if the failure is clearly in the equipment itself, but what
if it is in the way it interacts with something outside it, some
unpredictable or unrecognised input codition? It works perfectly on the
bench, only to fail when put into service ...again and again.
-- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)www.poppyrecords.co.uk