Sujet : Re: Filter problem
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 13. Jun 2025, 16:46:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1rdvkeh.1a8nvgr1yl28xgN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
r qweqqaew;ewq john larkin <
jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:30:13 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
>
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:02:59 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
>
[..]
>
Heck, 150 MHz is almost DC.
>
Not with valves, it isn't
We were discussing building a bandpass fiter. At low power, the parts
can be one per cent of a wavelength long.
And at low power, tubes should be small, so plate capacitance will be
small, and can be rolled into the first bp filter capacitance.
I was intending to make the characteristic impedance of the filter 50
ohms so I could set it up easily with a VNR.
What's the plate capacitance of the tubes you plan to use?
ECC91= 2.5pf max with anodes paralleled
EF91 = 2.1pf (3.1pf if shielded)
Is your
output differential?
No, see:
<
http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/Radio/G8HEH/2metretransceiver.htm#TXMIX>
[...]
Come on, try it. It's 2025.
I can go out and buy a ready-made transceiver but I want to make one
using valves. It's a hobby but I want to approach it in a professional
manner.
-- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)www.poppyrecords.co.uk