Sujet : Re: OT: 'Peer Reviewed' Papers - a new scam!
De : user (at) *nospam* example.net (bitrex)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 28. May 2024, 22:02:38
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <6656385e$6$1258324$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/27/2024 7:11 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
"This ongoing degradation calls for a shift from traditional peer review
to rigorous live debates, ensuring accountability by having people argue
their cases in real time."
And not before time, say I.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trust-sciencethat-just-retracted-11000-
peer-reviewed-papers
I'm unsure if there have been any significant recent developments in conservative philosophy recently, but if there's been like, some paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of wingnutology I'm open to reading the journals that contain them.
But my impression has been that wingnutology is not shall we say a "highly nuanced philosophy" and that's one of the keys to its popularity, it doesn't need an academic journal to understand.
Love guns, love Trump, have a long list of commies, queers, and degenerate enemies that need to get waxed, and you've basically got at least a bachelors of arts in the field at this time. what more is there to know about it. Park your pickup in a EV parking spot is the equivalent of a masters degree. Kick a queer or homeless person straight in the head and you got your PhD, easy.