Liste des Groupes | Revenir à e design |
On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:03:16 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org><snip>
wrote:
On 7/06/2024 4:05 am, legg wrote:On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 23:18:12 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>On 6/06/2024 1:46 pm, legg wrote:
That's sort of what I'm talking about. You choose a part, you choose aYou mostly can't chose an EBIC model because the manufacturers treat them as "commercial in confidence".
model, you choose a parameter that allows a model to simulate
performance more accurately. You choose a circuit configuration
with component values.
From the larger spreadsheet, you see models for 'similar devicesSilly question. Gummel-Poon doesn't model inverted bipolar transistor operation particularly well, but if you want anything else you will have measure the device parameters for yourself, and nobody here has ever claimed to have done that.
varying widely in performance in a particular circuit configuration.
So what is it, in the model, or in the circuit configuration, that
allows such a wide variation in performance. What parameter is a
true predictor? What weakness in the circuit is the wild card?
Looking for understanding or beneficial increase in knowledge here.Do try to understand what practical circuit designers actually do.
Not pushing or pulling the benefits or disadvantages of modeling
or breadboarding - already have pretty fixed opinions about that.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.