Re: Photocell connection

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Photocell connection
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 10. Mar 2024, 15:45:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uskdi5$3041s$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:
I've noticed that when gas-filled photocells were used in valve
equipment, they were nearly always supplied with a low-impedance source
of +ve voltage to the anode and the signal was taken off a resistor in
the negative return.  There is a blocking capacitor between the
photocell cathode and the grid of the valve, so the standing current and
DC conditions don't appear to be relevant.
 
This means the photocell has to be connected by a 2-core screened cable,
which was an expensive luxury in those days.  It also has to be
thoroughly screened to prevent hum, whereas the cathode half-cylinder
would partly screen the anode and reduce the amount of extra screening
needed;  so what was the advantage of taking the signal from the cathode
instead of the anode"?
 

At a guess, it’s because it saved headroom to have a positive-going signal.
There’s a well-defined dark level.

Of course, in a general AC-coupled system, that doesn’t help as much unless
the photocurrent waveform is known to be very asymmetrical.

 Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Mar 24 * Photocell connection6Liz Tuddenham
10 Mar 24 +* Re: Photocell connection4Phil Hobbs
10 Mar 24 i`* Re: Photocell connection3Liz Tuddenham
11 Mar 24 i `* Re: Photocell connection2dgb (David)
11 Mar 24 i  `- Re: Photocell connection1Liz Tuddenham
10 Mar 24 `- Re: Photocell connection1John Larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal