Re: Interesting inductor

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Interesting inductor
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 14. Mar 2024, 13:31:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <usun6e$1j0c0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Clive Arthur <clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
On 13/03/2024 22:43, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:32:27 +0000, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
 
On 13/03/2024 04:18, John Larkin wrote:
 
<snip>
 
I'm hassling with inductors now too, but at the other end of the speed
spectrum.
 
We want a programmable inductor, from maybe 1 mH to 500 mH or so,
maybe 100 mA. Sounds like an inductive DAC, a series string of
inductors with shorting relays. If the step inductance ratio were,
say, 1.8:1 we could have some hidden bits, more than the customer
sees, so we could get pretty close to his requested value.
 
We could test all 2^n steps, make a list, and select the closest to
his request.
 
We're simulating loads to an engine control computer, torque motors
and solenoids and steppers.
 
 
Gyrator?
 
We just yesterday had a brainstorm session about that. How can one
make a programmable electronic fake inductor?
 
A real inductor stores energy, and can do things like high voltage
flyback. So a fake inductor should store energy, or pretend to. It
could be done with a current shunt, a fast ADC, some math in an FPGA,
a fast DAC, and a big power amplifier with big power supplies. Too
much work.
 
Yes, I got part way down the road of designing a gyrator to block
telemetry signals on a power line comms device.  Soon realised it would
need lots of power.
 
Just thinking out loud, and not really a serious suggestion, but would a
variac with a fixed inductor on the secondary work as a variable
inductor?  I guess 500:1 would be impossible.
 

Not a dumb idea at all.  To avoid using a motor to turn it, one or more
transformers with binary-weighted windings and relays, maybe.

The inductance of the transformer needs to be large enough, of course.

I’ve occasionally considered using a transformer to make an isolated
version of a dpot, but it’s never been quite the right solution, mostly on
account of limited inductance.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Mar 24 * Interesting inductor16Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 +* Re: Interesting inductor3Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 i`* Re: Interesting inductor2Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 i `- Re: Interesting inductor1Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 +- Re: Interesting inductor1Bill Sloman
14 Mar 24 +* Re: Interesting inductor8Clive Arthur
14 Mar 24 i`* Re: Interesting inductor7john larkin
14 Mar 24 i +* Re: Interesting inductor5Clive Arthur
14 Mar 24 i i+- Re: Interesting inductor1Phil Hobbs
14 Mar 24 i i+- Re: Interesting inductor1John Larkin
15 Mar 24 i i`* Re: Interesting inductor2john larkin
16 Mar 24 i i `- Re: Interesting inductor1Bill Sloman
14 Mar 24 i `- Re: Interesting inductor1piglet
14 Mar 24 `* Re: Interesting inductor3Cursitor Doom
14 Mar 24  `* Re: Interesting inductor2Phil Hobbs
14 Mar 24   `- Re: Interesting inductor1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal