Sujet : Re: Memristor cross bar arrays for faster AI neural nets and math?
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 18. Mar 2024, 12:49:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1qqm32r.1oh64rrklkkowN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
Jeroen Belleman <
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 3/18/24 05:55, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Source:
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Summary:
A team of engineers has proven that their analog computing device,
called a memristor, can complete complex, scientific computing tasks
while bypassing the limitations of digital computing.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/03/240314145325.htm
bit like our neural nets...
I have an issue with calling a memristor a 'computing device'. If
you accept that, then so are capacitors and inductors!
I don't see the problem. Switches, relays, beads on a string can all be
computing devices - and not all of them have 'memories'. Pots have been
used as computing elements on the front panel of analogue computers for
years, so what is the difference between them (set by hand) and a
memristor (set electronically)?
...and yes, capacitors are definitely computing devices: Blumlein/Miller
integrator.
-- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)www.poppyrecords.co.uk