Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing
De : robin_listas (at) *nospam* es.invalid (Carlos E.R.)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 02. May 2024, 10:22:25
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <13vbgkxlad.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2024-05-02 10:02, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 2 May 2024 08:28:35 +0200) it happened "Carlos E.R."
<robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote in <kdobgkxras.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>:
 
On 2024-05-02 07:24, Jan Panteltje wrote:
AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing
   https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/05/am-radio-is-a-lifeline-lawmakers-say-tech-and-auto-industries-disagree/
A recent test of the emergency alert system found only 1 percent got it via AM.
>
Strange. most is FM these days, or digital?
Something to do with Soros buying radio stations ;-) ?
>
>
You are talking of the USA?
 Yes USA
 
I would think that there are areas over there where FM in cars does not
work, and people have to use AM.
>
It happens in Spain, which is far smaller, so surely it happens in the USA.
 I think most if not all high power AM medium wave stations are gone now here in the Netherlands.
Lots of FM stations though.
 All I hear at home on the AM medium wave band is interference from wallwarts
and  maybe solar panels, what not..
Electric cars would create more interference...
The other day I had to tune the station I was listening to in AM instead of FM, because the car would not find the local station or it did not exist. And the area is very populated (south-east of Spain).
Not the first time.
Yes, I might tune it on internet instead, but it is a pain. Stations want you to use their own app instead of a generic one, and the generic often fails (probably because they change the url). I refuse to use the specific app that requires us to login, so the station can track its listeners by name.
--
Cheers, Carlos.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 24 * AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing31Jan Panteltje
2 May 24 +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing13Carlos E.R.
2 May 24 i+* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3Jan Panteltje
2 May 24 ii+- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Carlos E.R.
3 May 24 ii`- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1RodionGork
2 May 24 i+* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing7Don Y
4 May 24 ii`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing6Carlos E.R.
4 May 24 ii `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing5Don Y
4 May 24 ii  +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2John Larkin
4 May 24 ii  i`- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Ralph Mowery
4 May 24 ii  `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Carlos E.R.
4 May 24 ii   `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Don Y
3 May 24 i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Joe Gwinn
4 May 24 i `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Carlos E.R.
2 May 24 +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Martin Brown
2 May 24 i`- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Jan Panteltje
2 May 24 +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing5John Larkin
2 May 24 i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing4Martin Brown
2 May 24 i `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3John Larkin
2 May 24 i  `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Martin Brown
2 May 24 i   `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1john larkin
2 May 24 +- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Ralph Mowery
3 May 24 `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing9John Larkin
4 May 24  `* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing8Carlos E.R.
4 May 24   +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3John Larkin
4 May 24   i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Ralph Mowery
4 May 24   i `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1John Larkin
4 May 24   +* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing3Jeroen Belleman
4 May 24   i`* Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing2Carlos E.R.
5 May 24   i `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Jeroen Belleman
5 May 24   `- Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal