Sujet : Re: GPIB bus topology
De : devzero (at) *nospam* nospam.com (chrisq)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 04. May 2024, 17:15:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v15je9$17ofg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/2/24 01:42, Don Y wrote:
On 5/1/2024 2:54 PM, bitrex wrote:
I have several pieces of HP gear (DMM, counter, Agilent-branded triple-output supply) I'd like to connect to a National Instruments USB to GPIB adapter for some measurements.
>
IEEE 488 is somewhat before my time and I see that the connectors are stackable, is there a preferred bus topology for a few pieces of gear? Star, linear/daisy chain with the stack on the interface, linear/daisy chain with the stack on the first piece of gear? Does it matter much in this use case?
The bus is dog slow (by today's -- or yesterday's! -- standards) so topology
isn't that important. The cables, though, are costly, short and constrain
how you can (re)arrange your kit.
Consider, instead, GPIB-ethernet adapter(s) as this gives you a lot more
freedom in siting your kit. I move things around as my benchtop often
doesn't have space for prototype, power supplies, instruments, etc. so
things "come and go" -- even during a session -- as my needs change.
It's nice to only have to worry about a thin network cable (easily
disconnected with one hand, "blind") instead of a frigging "hose"!
>
Have gpib based test gear all around the lab, beyond the limit
of cables, which are clunky and heavy anyway. Solution here was
the Prologix lan to hpib adapter, which puts the test gear on
the local subnet, where it belongs. Have written an os package
to drive it, so that at top level, it's all shell scripts, and
Can be built and controlled by any unix with gcc and a shell,
even cygwin on windows.
Prologix used to be quite low cost, but they have raised the
price considerably since, which is a pain, but still lower than
the lan / hpib adapters from HP or NI...
Chris