Sujet : Re: CO2 Funny
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 23. May 2024, 06:30:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2mgp8$1jhrn$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 23/05/2024 12:54 am, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:58:13 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby
<news@spockmail.net> wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:00 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:
>
<snip>
>
Who says I don't? Unlike you, an odious little narcissist, I don't feel
the need to show everyone here how clever I am.
>
Spoken like a true liberal.
>
When things don't go your way... start name calling.
Exactly. Cheap insults are, well, cheap.
SED should be, and arguably was, a place where one could post
architectures and circuits and essentially publicly brainstorm, get
ideas from other people. Designing in public [1]. I've learned a lot
that way. And SED needs things to discuss instead of Climate Change
and Palestine. [2]
John Larkin doesn't design at all, and certainly not in public. He may have learned a lot, but he still has a lot to learn.
S.E.D. could use more electronic discussion, but popular issues keep people posting and reading between the ocasional bits of itnerswtign electronics. John Larkin has posted recipes here.
SED, and I guess usenet, is slowly dying. The nasty noise has driven
away most of the people who are really interested in electronics.
Says one of the nastier noise generators.
Can anyone recommend a better, more civil, moderated forum to discuss
electronic design?
1. [not the really good ones, obviously]
2. [opinions on such subjects are not testable. Circuits are.]
Opinions on that subject are easily testable - post a link to the "better" forum and we can look at it for ourselves.
What John Larkin seems to want is the fulsome flattery he isn't equipped to earn.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney