Re: An actual circuit

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: An actual circuit
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. May 2024, 20:41:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v2qmvv$101f$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"bitrex" <user@example.net> wrote in message
news:6650d62f$0$2363134$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
On 5/24/2024 2:00 PM, bitrex wrote:
>
Yes, it is mysterious. Set both drain resistors to 3.3K and zoom way
up on the two source voltages for the first 20 seconds.
>
LT Spice may have some hidden asymmetry. It has to do math
sequentially, maybe.
>
In real life, parts will be plenty asymmetric. Especially jfets.
>
>
There are bunch of variants of this circuit, I call it the "Forest Mims
Oscillator" cuz in one of his radio shack circuit books was where I first
remember seeing it as a teenager.
>
I'm pretty sure he didn't invent it though and that I've seen it in books
from the 60s also, it was probably invented about 5 minutes after the PNP.

Rufus P Turner's FET circuits is probably where I got the doing it with FETs
idea from.
It's on page 50 and easy to find a pdf.
It also says the RC circuit should matched to within 1% but not sure why.

I've not previously seen it with source resistors.
The idea of not connecting the sources to ground came about because I didn't
want the LED drive to affect the RC circuit.
So in my teens I just connected the source directly to the transistor base
with no other component and put the LED current limiting in the collector
circuit.

 



Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 24 * An actual circuit32Edward Rawde
23 May 24 `* Re: An actual circuit31john larkin
24 May 24  `* Re: An actual circuit30john larkin
24 May 24   `* Re: An actual circuit29Edward Rawde
24 May 24    +* Re: An actual circuit6john larkin
24 May 24    i+* Re: An actual circuit3bitrex
24 May 24    ii`* Re: An actual circuit2bitrex
24 May 24    ii `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i`* Re: An actual circuit2Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24    `* Re: An actual circuit22Jeroen Belleman
24 May 24     +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24     `* Re: An actual circuit20Edward Rawde
24 May 24      `* Re: An actual circuit19john larkin
24 May 24       `* Re: An actual circuit18Edward Rawde
24 May 24        `* Re: An actual circuit17john larkin
25 May 24         `* Re: An actual circuit16Phil Hobbs
25 May 24          `* Re: An actual circuit15Edward Rawde
25 May 24           `* Re: An actual circuit14Phil Hobbs
25 May 24            +- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24            `* Re: An actual circuit12john larkin
25 May 24             `* Re: An actual circuit11Phil Hobbs
25 May 24              `* Re: An actual circuit10Mike Monett VE3BTI
25 May 24               +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
25 May 24               +* Re: An actual circuit4john larkin
25 May 24               i`* Re: An actual circuit3Edward Rawde
25 May 24               i `* Re: An actual circuit2john larkin
25 May 24               i  `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24               `* Re: An actual circuit4Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                `* Re: An actual circuit3john larkin
25 May 24                 `* Re: An actual circuit2Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                  `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal