Re: An actual circuit

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: An actual circuit
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. May 2024, 05:19:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v2rlba$ies$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"john larkin" <jl@650pot.com> wrote in message
news:phk15jlc055d4p4b1qlicodl16v85u00d9@4ax.com...
On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:59:31 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jl@650pot.com> wrote in message
news:bk815jh3skuecf1tap8o41rpgdh5kkq8o5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 23 May 2024 13:06:46 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>
On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:35:00 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
I was having a conversation with a younger person who seemed to be of
the
view that to make an LED flash you would need something to decide when
it
should be on or off. So that would be some kind of software or digital
system.
...
>
If R2 and R6 are both 3.3k then LTSpice says it slowly drifts into
operation
after 40 seconds.
But why does it go one way and not the other?
Is that an artefact of asymmetry in the simulation?
Or is there some hidden asymmetry in the circuit I'm not seeing when R2 is
3.3k?
>
>
Yes, it is mysterious. Set both drain resistors to 3.3K and zoom way
up on the two source voltages for the first 20 seconds.

Why the crossover at 15 seconds?
I think reliable startup of the simulated symmetrical version has to be a
simulation artefact.

Now I'm curious what the real circuit would do.
I may have suitable parts.

>
LT Spice may have some hidden asymmetry. It has to do math
sequentially, maybe.
>
In real life, parts will be plenty asymmetric. Especially jfets.
 



Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 24 * An actual circuit32Edward Rawde
23 May 24 `* Re: An actual circuit31john larkin
24 May 24  `* Re: An actual circuit30john larkin
24 May 24   `* Re: An actual circuit29Edward Rawde
24 May 24    +* Re: An actual circuit6john larkin
24 May 24    i+* Re: An actual circuit3bitrex
24 May 24    ii`* Re: An actual circuit2bitrex
24 May 24    ii `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i`* Re: An actual circuit2Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24    `* Re: An actual circuit22Jeroen Belleman
24 May 24     +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24     `* Re: An actual circuit20Edward Rawde
24 May 24      `* Re: An actual circuit19john larkin
24 May 24       `* Re: An actual circuit18Edward Rawde
24 May 24        `* Re: An actual circuit17john larkin
25 May 24         `* Re: An actual circuit16Phil Hobbs
25 May 24          `* Re: An actual circuit15Edward Rawde
25 May 24           `* Re: An actual circuit14Phil Hobbs
25 May 24            +- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24            `* Re: An actual circuit12john larkin
25 May 24             `* Re: An actual circuit11Phil Hobbs
25 May 24              `* Re: An actual circuit10Mike Monett VE3BTI
25 May 24               +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
25 May 24               +* Re: An actual circuit4john larkin
25 May 24               i`* Re: An actual circuit3Edward Rawde
25 May 24               i `* Re: An actual circuit2john larkin
25 May 24               i  `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24               `* Re: An actual circuit4Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                `* Re: An actual circuit3john larkin
25 May 24                 `* Re: An actual circuit2Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                  `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal