Re: An actual circuit

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: An actual circuit
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. May 2024, 05:24:39
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <obm25jtajqj96tjutjmo4vhlvglje74444@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 24 May 2024 22:56:02 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

"Mike Monett VE3BTI" <spamme@not.com> wrote in message
news:XnsB17CDFBC01F77idtokenpost@135.181.20.170...
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
Insect cruelty. Plus you have to count their tiny feets backwards.
>
The only good bugs is dead bugs. ;)
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs
>
The major flaw with dead bugs is you lose the identification of the ic.
>
Six months later, you will have no idea what the circuit is, where the
important signals are, or how the circuit works.
>
Many high frequency ic's have a ground tab that must be connected to
ground. This is not possible with dead bugs.
>
Often not all of a prototype must be on a copperclad ground plane.
Perpheral supporting circuits can be placed on a prototype board, with a
section of ground plane mounted on the proto board as needed. This makes
mounting test points and input and output signals much easier.
>
Amazon has a large selection of suitable proto boards:
>
https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=prototype+pcb+board
>
>
I used to like Speedwire, particularly if I wanted and 8-bit CPU and a bunch
of 22V10s.
But it's no surprise I can barely find any reference to it now.
>
https://www.google.com/search?&q=speedwire+bicc-vero&tbm=isch
>
https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/contenteetimes-images-01mdunn-benchtalk-proto4.jpg
>
>
--
MRM
>

It's cheap and easy now to make a few double-side or multilayer PCBs
for anything complex.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 24 * An actual circuit32Edward Rawde
23 May 24 `* Re: An actual circuit31john larkin
24 May 24  `* Re: An actual circuit30john larkin
24 May 24   `* Re: An actual circuit29Edward Rawde
24 May 24    +* Re: An actual circuit6john larkin
24 May 24    i+* Re: An actual circuit3bitrex
24 May 24    ii`* Re: An actual circuit2bitrex
24 May 24    ii `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i`* Re: An actual circuit2Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24    `* Re: An actual circuit22Jeroen Belleman
24 May 24     +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24     `* Re: An actual circuit20Edward Rawde
24 May 24      `* Re: An actual circuit19john larkin
24 May 24       `* Re: An actual circuit18Edward Rawde
24 May 24        `* Re: An actual circuit17john larkin
25 May 24         `* Re: An actual circuit16Phil Hobbs
25 May 24          `* Re: An actual circuit15Edward Rawde
25 May 24           `* Re: An actual circuit14Phil Hobbs
25 May 24            +- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24            `* Re: An actual circuit12john larkin
25 May 24             `* Re: An actual circuit11Phil Hobbs
25 May 24              `* Re: An actual circuit10Mike Monett VE3BTI
25 May 24               +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
25 May 24               +* Re: An actual circuit4john larkin
25 May 24               i`* Re: An actual circuit3Edward Rawde
25 May 24               i `* Re: An actual circuit2john larkin
25 May 24               i  `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24               `* Re: An actual circuit4Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                `* Re: An actual circuit3john larkin
25 May 24                 `* Re: An actual circuit2Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                  `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal